tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post5978610451686515819..comments2023-06-12T18:05:09.048+02:00Comments on Perl-Uwe.com: Day 17: nice schema definition for DBIx::ClassUwehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12178704398121428849noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-19686324073820433892011-01-26T06:22:15.627+01:002011-01-26T06:22:15.627+01:00You are absolutely right. I promised (and until no...You are absolutely right. I promised (and until now failed to deliver) three things: an Advent calendar reflection, an update to my <a href="http://www.perl-uwe.com/2010/11/benchmark-of-uuid-generation-with-perl.html" rel="nofollow">UUID benchmark</a> and my motivation for switching to RDBO.<br /><br />In one sentence, I switched because DBIC is the community standard and nowadays I prefer mainstream over fringe group.<br /><br />I will try to express this a little better in a bigger blog post, but I will write them in above order.Uwehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10575095551561928941noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-34613823832612222992011-01-25T23:21:11.835+01:002011-01-25T23:21:11.835+01:00Still waiting to know why you came to prefer DBIC ...Still waiting to know why you came to prefer DBIC over RDBO .. ;)Arun Prasaadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11813626639954981041noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-53415517554828664352010-12-18T08:54:06.619+01:002010-12-18T08:54:06.619+01:00Yeah, I know. RDBO is really fast. And it really i...Yeah, I know. RDBO is really fast. And it really is a very good ORM. I was a happy user all the time. There were a lot of bugs in the beginning, but John fixed them instantly. The documentation is very good, too.<br /><br />It's just that my priorities have changed. I will explain (and discuss) that in a later blog entry (when the Advent calendar is over).Uwehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10575095551561928941noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-58815342054539768632010-12-18T02:28:31.878+01:002010-12-18T02:28:31.878+01:00A good reason to stick with RDBO: https://code.goo...A good reason to stick with RDBO: https://code.google.com/p/rose/wiki/RDBOBenchmarksAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-66396081177341200852010-12-17T18:09:51.195+01:002010-12-17T18:09:51.195+01:00John, can you point me to some example code?
Thank...John, can you point me to some example code?<br />Thanks.Uwehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10575095551561928941noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-16825044097912906232010-12-17T18:04:16.424+01:002010-12-17T18:04:16.424+01:00For what its worth, I use Moose with DBIC all the ...For what its worth, I use Moose with DBIC all the time and find it very useful for my result and resultset classes. I've actually used MooseX::Declare with that because I find the method signatures very useful for my domain logic.John Napiorkowskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14413684212565071596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-7697417541454523102010-12-17T08:44:14.545+01:002010-12-17T08:44:14.545+01:00Fey was not around when I decided to use RDBO. I l...Fey was not around when I decided to use RDBO. I looked at Fey::ORM and after Dave's talk at the YAPC::EU 2010 I decided it's no fit for me. I do not remember the exact reasons for this, but I remember clearly me decision. I was glad to put a "checkmark" behind this topic. Especially because the full Moose integration was/is very attractive to me.Uwehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10575095551561928941noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4404522972176775500.post-25895317870289396462010-12-17T02:14:37.379+01:002010-12-17T02:14:37.379+01:00What about Fey?What about Fey?Jakub Narebskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11847202568800326989noreply@blogger.com